Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 6.1
    • Component/s: Rules
    • Labels:

      Description

      One of the two messages of RSPEC-3077 was not clear enough: "Remove the "volatile" keyword from this field"

      Removing the volatile keyword is only part of the fix. This message is now replaced with:
      "Use a thread-safe type; adding "volatile" is not enough to make this field thread-safe."

      The other message, i.e. "Use an "Atomic[Reference|Integer|Long]Array" instead." is fine.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                michael.gumowski Michael Gumowski
                Reporter:
                nicolas.harraudeau Nicolas Harraudeau
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                1 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Due:
                  Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: